Re: semi-RFS: xenium - good enough for me (at the moment)
Hi Steffen,
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 10:02:42PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There is more to the package than I managed to investigate:
> - How is the benchmarking properly invoked? It builds at least.
I have no idea for the moment.
> - How is the google test properly built/performed? Better have a look
> at azure-pipelines.yml
Could you please add DEP3 header to your patch that deals with gtest
issues? Its not obvious for the reader what your changes (basically
commenting out things) are approaching.
> - Why does the build fail over detecting pthread bits when I enable the
> (optional) libcds inclusion?
You mean when enabling what you commented in d/rules with
# -DWITH_LIBCDS="1"
?
> But there is documentation built and as a headers-only library the files
> also install neatly to /usr/include/xenium. This should be sufficient to
> eventually address the reverse dependency mmmulti, but, .. if someone
> reading this feels like rounding this up - would be much appreciated.
> What's nagging the most is that I lack the time to edutain myself on the
> nitty gritty of parallel computing that these libraries are helping
> with. So, I finished this "functional enough for Covid-19" package but
> cannot do more to make it a prime example for Debian packaging.
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/xenium
I've done a bit of polishing and did a version upgrade but I was not
really addressing your questions. May be one of the great new members
(in CC or anybody else :-) ) might catch up in more detail.
> Many thanks and best wishes to everyone,
Thanks for your initial preparation
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: