[I'm cc'ing the Debian Med mailing list as your email contains no
private information]
Dear Giulio,
It is nice to hear that you are finding the Debian package of bcftools
useful. The correct way to request support from the volunteer
contributors to Debian is to documented at
https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting
<https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting>
Cheers!
--
Michael R. Crusoe
On Sat, Jun 13, 2020, 20:0 Giulio Genovese <giulio.genovese@gmail.com
<mailto:giulio.genovese@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Michael,
I have noticed you are involved in the packaging of the bcftools
software as a debian package. I am not sure whether you are the
right person I should address, but if not maybe you can help me
find who I should address instead.
I have been working with bcftools and in particular with dockers
that must run bcftools inside. This is all made very simple by the
bcftools debian package. However, I have noticed that the approach
of installing bcftools as a debian package causes apt-get to also
pull perl and perl modules which cause the docker image to
increase in size significantly. The bcftools package contains a
handful of python and perl binaries, but the main software is
written in C and has very few dependencies. Currently python is a
suggested dependency, while perl is a mandatory dependency. This
seems a bit inconsistent. Could the perl dependency also be made
optional? This would go a long way making it easier to generate
minimalistic docker images with a minimal footprint using apt-get.
All the best,
Giulio