Re: New lintian warning: mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure Debian Med Packaging Team <debian-med-packaging@lists.alioth.debian.org>
- To: Debian Med Project List <debian-med@lists.debian.org>
- Cc: 958666@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: New lintian warning: mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure Debian Med Packaging Team <debian-med-packaging@lists.alioth.debian.org>
- From: Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 10:43:53 +0900
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20200504014353.GC3214@bubu.plessy.net>
- In-reply-to: <20200427095222.GQ1150@an3as.eu>
- References: <20200424075624.GU21172@an3as.eu> <f3c19abc-6f13-4dbe-960e-8fc74e02e127@www.fastmail.com> <20200424125731.GE21172@an3as.eu> <fb94994c-7eb3-4824-b589-91a147ca180b@www.fastmail.com> <20200424224059.GA18356@bubu.plessy.net> <20200425055339.GL21172@an3as.eu> <20200425072803.GB24244@bubu.plessy.net> <20200427095222.GQ1150@an3as.eu>
Le Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 11:52:22AM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/resfinder/
>
> Both versions *.pl and *.py remain in source and it took me a long
> time to get an answer from upstream / our users what is really used
> and what should be packaged. See also README.Debian.
Hi Andreas,
thanks a lot for this interesting example.
I think that it supports my point of view, because the resfinder.pl and
resfinder.py are not drop-in replacements for each other. In
particular, they do not support the same set of command-line arguments.
In that sense, the Python version looks like a version 2 of the Perl
command, without full backwards compatibility.
Let's imagine now that we would have renamed `resfinder.pl` to just
`resfinder` and that on a package upgrade, we would replace it by
a renamed `resfinder.py`. We would just break our users scripts.
Have a nice day,
Charles
--
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Akano, Uruma, Okinawa, Japan
Reply to: