On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 11:22 +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 02:34:26PM -0800, Diane Trout wrote: > > What's the debian-med team's position on whether or not to include > > the > > upstream history as described in: > > I don't think there is a "team's position" on it, except that it's > not > usual at all. > Personally, I find it more confusing then anything else, in all the > packages where this schema is used. I've tried it and feel like I'm more likely to mistakes when updating. I felt like packages intended for teams it's probably better to stay with the simpler workflow for now. But I wanted to check. Diane
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part