On 18.02.19 16:39, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Andreas Tille <andreas@fam-tille.de> writes:Sidenote: Should cn3d be a separate binary package? I am a fan.That's a different question - I have put Aaron in CC.Sure, I can split it out if that would be helpful; thanks for calling the suggestion to my attention. I'm inclined to call the binary package ncbi-cn3d for consistency with other NCBI package names.
Hi Aaron, ncbi-cn3d would do, but cn3d is pretty unique such that IMHO it could also stand alone. You may decide to have ncbi-tools-x11 depend or at least recommend on it. Best, Steffen