[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [MoM] FAST progress (was Re: [MoM] fast: Add further dependencies to enable chroot / cowbuilder to build)

Hello Andreas,

> Both sounds sensible.  I try to check your commits soon.


I also see no reason why the test suite will not work now. As far as the
binary executes for me (until the opencl limitation), I see no asset-
related assertion or error. Curious to see if we get a success with testing.

Kind regards,
Shayan Doust

On 01/09/2019 22:12, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 10:30:33PM +0100, Shayan Doust wrote:
>> I have used /usr/share/fast instead, I didn't think of this.
>>> Those binaries that have a purpose as user utilities should probably
>>> go to /usr/bin and adding a manpage (perhaps by using
>>> createmanpages[1]).
>> A bit more investigation. The issue with this is that it is generally
>> not user friendly (maybe proof of concept). These binaries also expect
>> that you have the FAST_Test_Data.xz extracted in the same directory as
>> them or using your own data set. In this case, it probably won't be wise
>> to have it in /usr/bin as there is no interactivity. Maybe your initial
>> suggestion of having these in /usr/lib/fast and having a documentation
>> explaining these under /usr/share/doc/libfast-examples/examples would be
>> better. Sorry if I have not been clear to begin with, making more and
>> more discoveries and understanding with a fairly big project.
> Both sounds sensible.  I try to check your commits soon.
> Kind regards
>       Andreas.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to: