[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#928333: marked as done (RM: augustus, bedtools, cyvcf2, delly, dwgsim, fastqtl, hilive, nanopolish, qtltools, samtools, segemehl, smalt [i386] -- ANAIS; ROM; i386 no longer supported upstream)

Your message dated Mon, 24 Jun 2019 22:02:30 +0000
with message-id <E1hfX2k-000Fl7-SS@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#928333: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #928333,
regarding RM: augustus, bedtools, cyvcf2, delly, dwgsim, fastqtl, hilive, nanopolish, qtltools, samtools, segemehl, smalt [i386] -- ANAIS; ROM; i386 no longer supported upstream
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

928333: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=928333
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Owner: Debian Med team <debian-med@lists.debian.org>
Hello, this request is a repeat of https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=914991
The *i386 packages have somehow crept back in for all the reverse-(build-)deps of htslib binary packages.
Could the removal of *i386 binary packages that (build-)depend on any of the htslib binary packages be repeated?
Thanks. See also https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=927850
Michael R. Crusoe
Co-founder & Lead,
Common Workflow Language project

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

  augustus | 3.3.2+dfsg-2 | i386
  bedtools | 2.27.1+dfsg-4 | i386
     delly |    0.8.1-2 | i386
    dwgsim |   0.1.12-2 | i386
   fastqtl | 2.184+dfsg-6+b1 | i386
    hilive |      1.1-2 | i386
nanopolish |   0.11.0-2 | i386
python-cyvcf2 |   0.10.8-1 | i386
python3-cyvcf2 |   0.10.8-1 | i386
  qtltools | 1.1+dfsg-3 | i386
  samtools |      1.9-4 | i386
  segemehl |    0.3.4-1 | i386
     smalt |    0.7.6-8 | i386

------------------- Reason -------------------
ANAIS; ROM; i386 no longer supported upstream

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System.  Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 928333@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/928333

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing

Debian distribution maintenance software
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---

Reply to: