Re: Typo in edam scopes or new format

[Steffen Möller <steffen_moeller@gmx.de>]

On 08.04.19 22:34, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 12:10:23PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
> > > Many thanks for spotting this. I have no reply from Matúš, yet. My
> > > favorite solution would be to accept it either way. Otherwise, the
> > > plural form should win since there are typically more than one scope
> > > that a tool can be used for.
> > I missread this. It is about input(s)/output(s), not about scope(s). I
> > like the singular form much better. Would not want to change that, really.
> Please settle with **one** form, **change** it to the prefered form and
> **stick** to this.  The importer is checking for typos and either
> singular or plural is a typo (whatever you decide).
It shall be singular for both input and output. Please kindly adjust the
parser
and all other EDAM files then need to be adjusted.
>   I'd love if we make
> scientific decisions in biology and not linguistics.
;)

Best,
Steffen