Re: Please update fis-gtm package
Hi Amul,
ping. Will you be able to check my latest commits and finalise the
fis-gtm package. We should upload soonish since the freeze is
approaching.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 03:32:32PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Amul,
>
> may be you missed my last mail - just adding you in CC to avoid this.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 08:25:55AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi Amul,
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 01, 2018 at 11:56:01AM -0500, Amul Shah wrote:
> > >
> > > It’s been a busy few months and I keep telling myself that I’ll do the fis-gtm package next week. We released V6.3-006 at the end of last month, but the corporate security goon squad decided to block SourceForge.net and we’re still awaiting for permission to access it from corporate resources.
> >
> > If there is another URL where your releases are available for download
> > we could point the watch file to this alternative place.
> >
> > As a personal note: May be its time to leave SourceForge as hosting
> > platform. There are more modern and way less advertising noise ones
> > these days.
> >
> > > I tried searching (both in my email and via a mailing list search) for the package name discussion, but couldn’t find it. Could you resend it or remind me what the question is?
> >
> > The question is: The real binary package is renamed to always reflect
> > even the latest minor version change. This always requires the fis-gtm
> > package to pass Debian new queue. I was wondering with it might be
> > sufficient to say for instance have a package named
> >
> > Package: fis-gtm-6.3
> >
> > instead of even adding -004, -006, etc. to the package name. I have no
> > idea about the practival implications since I'm not a fis-gtm user but
> > it might be worth discussing in your team whether the Debian packages
> > are really used in all minor version changes.
> >
> > Kind regards
> >
> > Andreas.
> >
> > --
> > http://fam-tille.de
> >
> >
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>
>
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: