Re: Bug#878498: snakemake FTBFS with Python 3.6 as default
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 10:53:00PM +0100, chrysn wrote:
>
> The current master passes build in a cowbuilder that has access to
> python3-ratelimiter, and lintian's only serious complaints are the
> privacy violations (JavsScript and badges in the documentation and some
> web application templates -- Snakemake has a web application?) that have
> been there in the old release too and I don't have a plan on how to fix
> them yet.
Thanks a lot. I've rebuild your work. I think patching the privacy
issues are not that hard. I've done such things in the past and will
have a look tomorrow.
> The new test suite system patch-outs are for
>
> * r-cran-rmarkdown (filed as #884115, thanks Andreas for ITP-ing), and
As I wrote in my other mail that's a terrible mix of JS without source
and I failed to find the source of two remaining ones. Actually one of
the hardest cran packages I ever touched. :-((
> * google-cloud-sdk (quoting the patch description: Whether this needs
> a Debian RFP or should be forwarded is undecided yet given I have no
> clue about what those Google Cloud SDK actually does).
I also had a short look previously and also have no clear opinion.
> IMO that package state is an enhancement over the last one in the
> archive and can be considered for upload, if one is willing to accept
> the abovementioned lintian warnings.
I'll care for the privacy issue and will upload tomorrow.
Thanks for your work on this
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: