Re: CD-HIT binaries (Was: [GSoC] Help needed for verifying cd-hit test)
For those who want to test: I've just pushed a patch using upstream
names and keeping the old names. The old names are intentionally
without manpages - so lintian will remember us that something should be
done here.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 12:52:36PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Sascha,
>
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 11:27:44AM +0100, Sascha Steinbiss wrote:
> > > Is there anybody who would
> > > expect to find a /usr/bin/cdhit executable in any scripts or should we
> > > rather rename to cd-hit to fit the upstream binary.
> >
> > I remember that I had to patch upstream code a couple of times to change
> > the name of the CD-HIT/CD-HIT-EST binaries to match the Debian names
> > instead of upstream's ones.
>
> Ahhh. May be some bug report / discussion here would have enabled a
> more straightforward solution.
>
> > I'd need to update these then... it might
> > also help to keep both variants in, for instance the other one as a symlink?
>
> I admit I've considered to keep the old names for compatibility but at
> the same time I would like to stop this at a certain point in time since
> I see no point in bloating /usr/bin.
>
> Thanks for the helpful comment
>
> Andreas.
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>
>
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: