[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: upstream/metadata with references to software catalogs^Wregistries?




On 06/22/2016 02:12 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> [For readers of Blends list: We are discussing an additional field
>  in debian/upstream/metadata ]
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 01:12:46PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
>> Our plans are to offer reference to
>>  * the bio.tools registry (obviously)
>>  * the SeqWiki (since this community feeds the bio.tools and for now we
>> would start upload to bio.tools what is not coming from the SeqWiki)
>>
>> The debian/upstream/metadata file would then for bowtie see the
>> additional lines
>>
>> Registry:
>>   Name: bio.tools
>>   Entry: http://bio.tools/tool/DebianMed/bowtie/1.1.1
>> Registry:
>>   Name: SEQwiki
>>   Entry: http://seqanswers.com/wiki/Bowtie
> Just for the Syntax:  This should rather be
>
> Registry:                                                                                                                                                                                                       
>  -  Name: bio.tools                                                                                                                                                                                               
>     Entry: http://bio.tools/tool/DebianMed/bowtie/1.1.1                                                                                                                                                           
>  -  Name: SEQwiki                                                                                                                                                                                                 
>     Entry: http://seqanswers.com/wiki/Bowtie                                                                                                                                                                      
>
> This would ensure that we have only one Registry field which might
> contain a set of values.
>  
>> The bio.tools registry has the obvious problem that the version should
>> not be passed along. Fixable, one tends to think.
> ... fixable at bio.tools side you mean, right?
>  
>> The motivation for a package maintainer to add those references could be
>>  * better visibility, i.e. hope for a reverse link, so the own work is
>> found more quickly, at least for the bio.tools this is coming
>>  * the references may guide users to additional information on how to
>> include the package in their workflow
> Please note:  Adding these values to upstream/metadata does not make
> things user visible automatically.  We need to patch tasks pages / other
> things to let the data show up.
would be nice indeed to get metadata info visible directly from the web
or via a debian command like apt-meta  package_source_name ;-)
>
>> If there is no opposition to add such references, then we may go ahead
>> with a few today.
> I'm CCing Blends list to get further input for the idea.
>
> Kind regards
>
>        Andreas. 
>

-- 
Olivier Sallou
IRISA / University of Rennes 1
Campus de Beaulieu, 35000 RENNES - FRANCE
Tel: 02.99.84.71.95

gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438  (keyring.debian.org)
Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335  D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438


Reply to: