Re: plastimatch/1.6.5+dfsg1-1 prep
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 01:56:03PM +0000, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> > > Both libblas-dev and libblas-dev | libblas.so would lead to successful
> > > builds on autobuilders. The latter always pick libblas-dev in case an
> > > alternative implementation is not already installed.
> >
> > OK, so there is no real point to change anything since I only use clean
> > chroots for building (and expect others to do so as well at least before
> > uploading, right?
>
> I'd say this change is probably not a reason for releasing a new iteration of
> the package. However, not all users build from chroots and those would enjoy
> being able to use their preferred BLAS implementation.
OK, fine. Would you mind simply commiting your proposed change to Git
to make sure it is done correctly (since I'm not fully sure whether I
did understood you correctly). This makes sure it will not be forgotten
next time. :-)
Thanks a lot for your hints
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: