Last chance to veto the removal of conquest-dicom-server [Was: Bug#831100: Can we remove conquest-dicom-server since nobody seems to care?]
Hi folks,
this is the last chance to veto the removal of this package. If nobody
insists I'll ask ftpmaster for removal.
Kind regards
Andreas.
----- Forwarded message from Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> -----
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 10:47:46 +0100
From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>
To: 831100@bugs.debian.org, Debian Med Project List <debian-med@lists.debian.org>
Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <mathieu.malaterre@gmail.com>, Pablo Lorenzzoni <spectra@debian.org>
Subject: Bug#831100: Can we remove conquest-dicom-server since nobody seems to care?
X-Debian-PR-Message: followup 831100
X-Debian-PR-Package: src:conquest-dicom-server
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: sid stretch
X-Debian-PR-Source: conquest-dicom-server
Hi,
RC bug #831100 about gcc 6 issue did not received any response since
more than 3 monthes and the popcon of this package is quite low. I
realised that not even the Git repository was representing the uploaded
packaging state (which is fixed now).
Is this package worth spending any energy into - and if yes, who likes
to volunteer doing the work? There might be some option to sneak into
upstream beta release to seek for gcc-6 issue fixes.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
_______________________________________________
Debian-med-packaging mailing list
Debian-med-packaging@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging
----- End forwarded message -----
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: