[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [GSoC] Phyml test issues



Hi Canberk,

any news?

Kind regards

      Andreas.

On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 08:31:15PM +0300, Canberk Koç wrote:
> 
> 2016-09-05 15:53 GMT+03:00 Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>:
> 
> > Hi Canberk,
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:33:13AM +0300, Canberk Koç wrote:
> > > I will keep that in mind. I'll be passive for a few days than i'll go on
> > > work.
> >
> > Any luck to verify the tests of phyml?
> >
> > Kind regards
> >
> >      Andreas.
> >
> > > 2016-08-24 10:00 GMT+03:00 Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>:
> > >
> > > > Hi Canberk,
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 09:46:33PM +0300, Canberk Koç wrote:
> > > > > Test examples are a combibation of these large data set so it is not
> > > > > specific.
> > > >
> > > > Yes.  However, it should be possible to *easily* recreate all files in
> > > > our packages even for an outsider.
> > > >
> > > > > I'll look phyml again.
> > > >
> > > > Good.
> > > >
> > > > Here is an updated todo list:
> > > >
> > > >         phyml (check/fix test)
> > > >         njplot (https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-med/njplot.git)
> > > >         macsyfinder
> > > >         picard-tools
> > > >         filo
> > > >
> > > > Kind regards
> > > >
> > > >        Andreas.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > http://fam-tille.de
> > > >
> >
> > --
> > http://fam-tille.de
> >
> >

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


Reply to: