Re: Status of seqan
Hi Andreas,
> is it correct to assume that packaging seqan2 version 2.2 instead of 2.1
> is the right way to go and should I help doing so?
Well, if I could make a wish, then I would say 2.2 for sure! I have a
half-ready package for the free fast BLAST replacement Lambda [1] and
upstream states that current releases will 'work with the last official
SeqAn release' so I guess that would be 2.2. It would be great to get to
finish this ;)
Cheers
Sascha
[1] https://github.com/seqan/lambda
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 09:10:27AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:52:54PM +1000, Kevin Murray wrote:
>>>
>>> There were many complex merge conflicts between master and upstream. It was
>>> actually a lot easier to resolve than I expected. It's now ready for review.
>>> However, it would be great if someone could take a close look at the package,
>>> particularly to ensure that the source is exactly what upstream provides (I've
>>> tried to check this with git, and I think I got it right, but more experienced
>>> eyes may differ).
>>
>> When trying to compare Upstream with the Git archive I stumbled upon the
>> first question: Any reason to stick to version 2.1.0 if 2.2.0 is out?
>> May be the question is naive, but if we have trouble managing a single
>> seqan version (we failed to fix bugs for a long time) and now agreed
>> upon the need for two versions - old 1.4.2 (see my other mail) and 2.x
>> series, does the status of the Git repository mean you intend to package
>> 2.1 and 2.2 separately?
>>
>>>>> Shall we start with a "simple" libseqan2-dev package with the latest upstream
>>>>> version (2.2.0)? I'll see if I can build on Michael's work in the seqan2
>>>>> package.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, please keep it as simple as possible (but not simpler :-P ).
>>>
>>> Working on this now. There are already a couple of errors, so we'll see how I
>>> go. I'll try to push early and often, so don't assume that the repo is in a
>>> working state :).
>>
>> No visible commit since
>>
>> commit 003f498e234ecc31229f6ba624c9d1afc6618d0d
>> Author: Kevin Murray <spam@kdmurray.id.au>
>> Date: Thu Jul 21 17:54:39 2016 +1000
>>
>> Did you pushed regularly? Please git pull - I've fixed Vcs fields.
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>> Andreas.
>>
>> --
>> http://fam-tille.de
>>
>>
>
--
The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is operated by Genome Research
Limited, a charity registered in England with number 1021457 and a
company registered in England with number 2742969, whose registered
office is 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE.
Reply to: