[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Request for sponsoring: dcmtk to experimental

Am Sonntag, den 08.05.2016, 16:42 +0000 schrieb Mattia Rizzolo:
> On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 05:31:07PM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote:
> > 
> > - Because upstream set the so-version to 8 I also changed the
> > library
> > package version to libdcmtk8 (instead of 6). 
> > - d/copyright overhaul
> What about dropping the manual -dbg in favour of the automatic ones?
Well, I'm a bit concerned about the proper upgrade path from these
packages. It seems this is not really defined, and since debsym
packages don't go into d/control, I also seems that there is no option
to define a virtual package -dbg to get this automatically. 

On the other hand the -dbg popcorn count is very low (2), so maybe
there is no real harm in dropping the -dbg package. 

I'll ping you on the list when this is done. 


Reply to: