Re: rsem ready for review (& sponsoring?)
Hi Michael,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 08:44:29PM +0000, Michael Crusoe wrote:
> I don't know if it is allowed to have a Recommends on a package that isn't
> in the archive yet, but rsem is ready for review.
Thanks for your work on this. I fixed two minor issues (git pull). I'm
not sure what ID you want to use so please make sure Uploaders and
changelog owner are equal.
> Note: more manpages may be needed;
While I have dropped the createmanpages script (and moved it in SVN from
package_template to helper-scripts since it remains to frequently in
packages) this might be helpful to create some manpages using help2man.
However, we have other packages with a lack of manpages and I would not
insist on these. What I'm a bit more concerned about are the
manpage-has-bad-whatis-entry
lintian warnings. Do you see any chance to fix this with some post
editing of the pod2man result?
> I'd also like it to have a test as well
> (though the trinityrnaseq tests use rsem).
I also like to see tests on every package where possible. I'd be fine
with uploading now to new and add the tests while the package is waiting
in new queue.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: