Hi Andreas Le 24/07/2015 18:21, Andreas Tille a écrit : > Hi Julien, > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 06:09:10PM +0200, Julien Lamy wrote: >> Would you agree with the following modifications? >> >> Short description: C++ wrapper library for DCMTK (DICOM toolkit) >> >> Long description: >> DCMTK++ is a wrapper library for DCMTK, a toolkit handling the DICOM >> medical imaging standard. DCMTK++ leverages C++ constructs to provide a >> more user-friendly API, notably for the networking part. Included in >> DCMTK++ are exception-based error handling, generic access to datasets >> elements, standard JSON representation of datasets, and generic >> implementation of messages, clients and servers for the various DICOM >> protocols. >> >> Other relevant information: >> Compared to the two main free-software C++ DICOM toolkits (DCMTK and >> GDCM), DCMTK++ provides either additional features (generic >> implementation of DICOM servers, missing from GDCM) and a modern C++ API >> (missing from DCMTK). We think that developers of DICOM application >> would benefit from DCMTK++, in term of code readability and ease of > > If you intend to include the second paragraph in the long description > as well, please drop the "Other relevant information:" and replace the > "We think" by some phrasing that does not use first person (lintian > would tell you anyway ;-)). Alternatively you could add the second > paragraph to a README.Debian (according to your preference). That second paragraph was more of a reply to the concerns raised on the ITP than part of the package description. Nonetheless, I'll try to rewrite it for a README.Debian so that Lintian does not complain. Is there anything that this tool doesn't see? :-) Best, -- Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature