[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Packaging HTQC for Debian - one test failure



[Please note that the Debian Med list is in CC to this mail to
 let other team members know.]

Hi again,

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 06:59:59PM +0800, Xi Yang wrote:
> I uploaded a new source tarball "htqc-1.92.3-Source.tar.gz". The bug is actually fixed long time ago but I forgot to upload the package.

OK, this helps.  However, considering your later remark:  Is there any
reason not to choose the name

    htqc2-1.92.3-Source.tar.gz 

>From a packagers point of view it makes sense to use the same name as
the download archive.  If you might continue to maintain htqc1 and htqc2
our automatic sentinel that tracks download locations will have touble
to realise new versions of htqc (version 1) since the htqc2 download
tarballs seem to be higher.

> >Hmm, I have worked on version 1.92.1 anyway - so my problem report is
> >about this version.  I did not (yet) intended to package any older
> >version (except if you would convince me to do so).
> Please also package htqc-0.90.8 and name it to be htqc1. It is required in some of my other packages (actually, TCRklass), and it is very grateful if you are willing to package it. And the 1.92.3 should be named htqc2. Thanks!

I'll put this on my todo list.  In any case you could help me to write a
proper description that explains the differences to the users.  The
current packaging (under the name htqc - I did not yet updated to htqc2)
contains the description you see here:


  https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-med/htqc.git/tree/debian/control 


It would be great if you would

  * review this description
  * send me a description for htqc1

I could also put TCRklass on my todo list.

Thanks for your hints

     Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


Reply to: