On August 4, 2015 03:00:58 PM Andreas Tille wrote: > On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 07:25:55AM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > On August 2, 2015 07:13:09 AM Andreas Tille wrote: > > Gccxml: I have taken your idea of a compatibility wrapper around castxml, > > implemented the suggestions of Brad King [2] and am in the process of > > testing it with all the packages that build using gccxml. > > Cool. This might hopefully enable us to simplify the porting of other > packages. Hope so. Just uploaded a new gccxml with the wrapper, closing #792280 (gccxml not ready for GCC 5). > > mummy and activiz.net: I have not looked in detail at either, yet. I just looked at mummy and discovered it doesn't build in sid right now. There's a link problem that I think is simply due to the mono packages not yet having been built with GCC 5 (in sid). Mono has a GCC 5 build but right now only in Experimental. I think we're blocked on mummy until that hits Sid. Activiz.net similarly builds on mono (and also mummy) so I think we're also blocked there. Regards, -Steve
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.