Hello Andreas, > I admit I somehow regret that I had the following GSoC idea to late: > > Provide test suites for all Debian Med packages > > I think this makes a great GSoC project - we should remember this for > next year. +1 One option to provide some tests in this case could be based on publicly available data, e.g. from [1]: Create results with the old version of the software and test the new version against these results. This should not be too difficult, but the selection of the data should be done by someone who actually knows about this gene sequencing stuff in order to obtain a test set that covers a wide variety of possible inputs. > I guess the code copy of the old seqan will show several C++ problems as > well. So IMHO trying to work with this is similarly fruitless as trying > to port the code to new seqan. Usually solving these errors is quite straightforward, so if you think that for know it would make sense to include the old code, I could do the porting to the new C++ compiler, and then, when we have a test set we could focus on moving to the new seqan. Best, Gert [1] http://www.gigasciencejournal.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part