On 08/28/2014 07:01 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > when checking my Maintainer dashboard dashboard I realised that the > watch file of netlib-java and libmtj-java became disfunctional and when > tracking down the issue I noticed that both projects moved from SF to > Github. While I updated the URLs in SVN accordingly I noticed that the > Build system has changed as well which just crosses my (low) level of > Java competence (again). > > Since both packages are definitely not really in the field of Debian Med > but just preconditions for some biological package (beast) I wonder > whether this might be the right point in time to move the package to > Debian Java. I'd volunteer to inject the package into Debian Java Git > but in turn I would need some help (starting with netlib-java). I have > the feeling that the amount of work for a skilled Java packager is low > (but I really would not regard myself as such a person). > > BTW, the packages are hanging around in contrib since netlib depends > from f2j (at least the current version). I'll send a separate mail to > f2j authors to try (again) to convince them to use a DFSG free license. > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > Hello Andreas, If you're willing to migrate these to the pkg-java repo, I'll work on updating them and uploading them as Java Team packages. Also, I've been meaning to send you a mail regarding libsnappy-java, since we have an RC bug there. The last commit makes it appear that you were considering moving it debian-med in 2012. Is that still the case? Cheers, tony
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature