Re: Updating fis-gtm package to 6.1
On 06/08/2014 06:01 PM (US Eastern Time), Luis Ibanez wrote:
[KSB] <…snip…>
Just to make sure that I'm summarizing the consensus from this discussion:
a) My understanding is that we will package both versions
of fis-gtm (6.0 and 6.1)
b) We will use the meta-package fis-gtm to point to the most recent
version.
c) The test scenario will be that a user should be able to have
both versions installed simultaneously, without conflict.
Please correct me, if I have misunderstood the conclusions.
[KSB] Luis, you are correct about all three. Could you also make the
following changes that the upstream version will pick up in the next
release, but which can be independently made to the Debian package of the
earlier releases?
Build the 32-bit flavor for i586, not i686, in order to allow the binary
to run on the Intel Galileo without recompilation.
Make a 1-line change to gtmprofile.gtc as follows (I will send you the
actual file off-list):
$ diff old/gtmprofile.gtc gtmprofile.gtc
84c84
< gtm_icu_version=`icu-config --version | gtm_chset=M
$gtm_dist/mumps -run %XCMD 'Read x Write $Piece(x,".",1,2)'`
---
> gtm_icu_version=`icu-config --version | gtm_chset=M
$gtm_dist/mumps -run %XCMD 'Read x Write
$Select(+x>48:$Piece(x,".",1)/10,1:$Piece(x,".",1,2))'`
$
Effective version 4.9, ICU introduced a regression by combining the major
and minor versions of the ICU version into the return result of
icu-config --version, e.g., 49.1.2 vs. 4.8.1.1 (see
http://userguide.icu-project.org/design#TOC-Version-Numbers-in-ICU). The
change allows fis-gtm to work with both ICU 4.8 and 4.9.
Regards
-- Bhaskar
Thanks
Luis
--
GT.M - Rock solid. Lightning fast. Secure. No compromises.
_____________
The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you.
Reply to: