Re: On the future of FILO.
- To: arq5x@virginia.edu
- Cc: debian-med@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: On the future of FILO.
- From: Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 21:36:13 +0900
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20140209123613.GC31627@falafel.plessy.net>
- In-reply-to: <20131126003841.GB21768@falafel.plessy.net>
- References: <20131109024217.GD28520@falafel.plessy.net> <20131109074247.GA29713@falafel.plessy.net> <20131109093004.GB23347@an3as.eu> <20131110234509.GB6379@falafel.plessy.net> <20131111072128.GA27001@an3as.eu> <20131112124111.GA18517@falafel.plessy.net> <20131125201259.GB24661@an3as.eu> <20131126003841.GB21768@falafel.plessy.net>
Le Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 09:38:41AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> Dear Aaron,
>
> I am contacting you because we have packaged FILO in Debian back in 2011 when
> the groupBy command had been removed from BEDTools. Since then, it has been
> added back to BEDTools, and the development of FILO have stopped.
>
> What is the future of FILO ? Perhaps we should remove it from Debian
> altogether ? This email is also send to the publicly archived Debian Med
> mailing list.
>
> If you still want a groupBy command intependant of BEDTools, maybe you can consider
> submitting it to larger packages ? "Moreutils" comes into mind.
>
> http://joeyh.name/code/moreutils/
Dear Aaron,
I was just wondering if you could help us to decide what to do with FILO in
Debian (see above).
Have a nice Sunday,
--
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
Reply to: