[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: duplicate work on ggplot2 ?



Hi,

I locally merged the (rare) differences from the git repository
with the svn repo. But I notized, that I created r-cran-ggplots2 and
NOT r-cran-ggplot2. Is it sufficient to make a "svn mv ...", or should
I use any other svn magic? 

Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> schrieb :

> Hi Ivo,
> 
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 04:33:10PM +0100, Ivo Maintz wrote:
> > > thanks for the clarification.
> > > 
> > > On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 03:21:00PM -0500, Carlos Borroto wrote:
> > > > > So I totally fail to see why you are commiting to a compeeting
> > > > > repository without talking to the maintainer of
> > > > > r-cran-ggplot2. Please make sure you coordinate your work and
> > > > > discuss here on the list to enable me understanding what's
> > > > > going on.
> > 
> > This was my  mistake - I have no idea, what went wrong. Nothing to
> > understand...
> 
> No problem.
> 
> > > I think the question is not about the team because Ivo is working
> > > inside Debian Med as well (otherwise I would probably not have
> > > noticed.)  As far as I know a r-cran team does not exist (which
> > > is a big shame in my opinion but that's a totally different
> > > topic.)  The only possible change Ivo might be interested in
> > > changing the VCS from your Git repository to SVN (should I say
> > > "back to SVN" considering the trend statistics I recently
> > > posted?)  Ivo, you as the person who presumably will do the
> > > largest amount of work on this package, should decide whether to
> > > use the existing Git repository or if you feel more comfortable
> > > with the work in SVN.  In any case you should take over at least
> > > the currently existing packaging into SVN and keep the changelog
> > > history in the packaging.
> > 
> > If I'd take over, I would prefer svn. But I should have a look on
> > the git repository anyhow.
> 
> Just let us know if you have any problem here.
> 
> Kind regards
> 
>        Andreas. 
> 


Reply to: