Re: duplicate work on ggplot2 ?
Hi Charles,
On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 10:16:01AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 08:02:00AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> > Le Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 03:41:19PM +0100, Ivo Maintz a écrit :
> > >
> > > I locally merged the (rare) differences from the git repository
> > > with the svn repo.
> >
> > Dear Ivo,
> >
> > what are your plans for ggplot2 now that Wheezy has been released ?
> >
> > Currently, the ggplot2 Debian package is quite oudated, and its development is
> > stalled between two repositories. The transition to Subversion happened for
> > you, but if you are not in position to finish your work in the short term,
> > maybe we can go ahead with the current Git repository.
>
> Dear Ivo,
>
> I have pushed a few changes on the Git repository. You are still welcome to
> switch to Subversion if you intend to take care of the package on a regular
> basis, but otherwise, I prefer Git.
If you finally decide to use Git please make sure you drop a file
trunk/packages/R/r-cran-ggplot2/trunk/README.status
in SVN with content
---
Format: 1
Status: git
SVNDeleteRevision: <SVN commit ID of removal>
URL: git://git.debian.org/debian-med/r-cran-ggplot2.git
Comment: >
This package is now managed in a Git repository.
to avoid further confusion. IMHO the fact that the package currently in the
Debian archive is in Git
$ apt-cache showsrc r-cran-ggplot2 | grep ^Vcs
Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=debian-med/r-cran-ggplot2.git;a=summary
Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/git/debian-med/r-cran-ggplot2.git
makes a clear preference for remaining here but once there was something
in SVN is reason enough to leave a signal there in case people have
checked out SVN and might wonder where the files were left.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: