Re: Packaging InVesalius
- To: debian-med@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Packaging InVesalius
- From: Thiago Franco Moraes <tfmoraes@cti.gov.br>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 16:25:08 -0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] CAMmoLX8UD8EUkrGHs06h7_kZe+r=RGvJ+KHVuccf2NnHuv4Gqg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <20121217161313.GE3385@an3as.eu>
- References: <CA+7wUsyE57NAVMEvaPe_m=2TF7pfthA6gt5SW5UvTnpszSj4tQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMmoLX8GPXz-VcU4-wm3QX1E95HKGEL4ZFewCM5CWgLG9rjo_Q@mail.gmail.com> <20121207154255.GA29118@an3as.eu> <CAMmoLX_OvbahYfowaGehjum6=8ZS+qptE3jO9zuSjX9yjB0Azw@mail.gmail.com> <20121210192942.GA21238@an3as.eu> <CAMmoLX_YgiSAuA8dD1NiC0C6bXxSBcAoECZT+Y3VTEjFY0EAxg@mail.gmail.com> <20121212104655.GC30639@an3as.eu> <CAMmoLX90xCEJED3YR5C1YQN+_tmg-SF8dphhVNf+VvoZPOqeFw@mail.gmail.com> <20121212191509.GM30639@an3as.eu> <CAMmoLX_eEqfQBdG+HuQDtACN14oTXN7Hg==WAuynqRAYwaAfLw@mail.gmail.com> <20121217161313.GE3385@an3as.eu>
Hi Andreas,
I was very busy working in InVesalius source code and solving other
problems, so I wasn't working in packaging InVesalius. Now I'm on
vacation and I think I can take some time to work in packaging :)
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> wrote:
> Hi Tiago
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 01:43:34PM -0200, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote:
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>> > Please also note that `dpkg --compare-versions` does consider 3.0.0.b3-1
>> > larger than 3.0.0-1 - so uscan might fail identifying your real release
>> > as a higher version than your beta release.
>>
>> I was reading [1] about this issue with version. So I'll need to use
>> something like this as version to InVesalius: 2.99+3.0b3-0tfmoraes1?
>> And I'll need to create a git tag with that version?
>
> Yes, this would be a possible solution. You could also simplify it by
> using
>
> 3.0~b3-1
As the name of invesalius repository is invesalius3, when I tag a
version as "3.0~b3-1", the tarball created will be named
invesalius3-3.0~b3-1. So I think I'll need to create manually a
tarball named invesalius-3.0~b3-1, isn't it? Or there is a way to
workaround it in github or in the watch file?
> which is also considered smaller than 3.0-1. This is a bit more
> handsome for reading but finally it does not matter much as long as the
> relation of the version numbers is correct. Whatever you decide you
> need to use versionmangling in debian/watch file. Just tell me what
> kind of version numbering you prefer and whether you need help in
> adapting debian/watch (which is sometimes a bit tricky and some
> experience is helpful in the beginning).
I'll try by myself. Any help I need I write here.
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
Best regards.
>> [1] - http://people.debian.org/~calvin/unofficial/
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121217161313.GE3385@an3as.eu
>
Reply to: