[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: sponsor upload aghermann-0.7.0.1-1 please



On Mon, 09 Jul 2012, andrei zavada wrote:
> (Odd thing here is that there appears libc_nonshared.a whereas linking is done
> with -shared.)

> I've googled the matter extensively, and none of the supposed solutions
> were helping (see, for example, http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2005-07/msg00168.html
> and this thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/automake-patches@gnu.org/msg00318.html).
> There are some "insightful" comments I left in src/libsigfile/Makefile.am.

sorry -- and thanks for details -- I have no clear ideas of WTF here

> As usual :}, builds verified with nd_build:

> aghermann_0.7.0.1-1~nd70+2_i386.build   OK      6:15.07 real, 173.55 user, 15.88 sys, 0 out
> aghermann_0.7.0.1-1~nd70+2_amd64.build  OK      6:23.82 real, 174.63 user, 19.36 sys, 0 out
> aghermann_0.7.0.1-1~nd+2_i386.build     OK      6:45.78 real, 197.76 user, 16.56 sys, 0 out
> aghermann_0.7.0.1-1~nd+2_amd64.build    OK      6:44.47 real, 194.86 user, 20.68 sys, 0 out

> It also builds on ubuntu precise.  (Honestly, nd_build was a great idea.)

hm, so you aren't building one for precise? well.. we need to 'release'
fresh neurodebian-tools pkgs I guess but meanwhile

* add nd+ubuntu-precise to your allnddists in
  /etc/neurodebian/cmdsettings.sh
* assure having a symlink (fresh debootstrap or just ln -s ;) )
  /usr/share/debootstrap/scripts/precise -> gutsy
* add cow for it with
  sudo nd_adddist nd+ubuntu precise

and then nd_build4allnd should build for precise as well

> Cheers,

I initiated build now and will upload to experimental and neurodebian
whenever get a chance (traveling in upcoming 2 days so might get delayed a bit)

-- 
Yaroslav O. Halchenko
Postdoctoral Fellow,   Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences
Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755
Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834                       Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419
WWW:   http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik        


Reply to: