Re: Bug#190753: Proposing to appeal to the tech. comittee about language extensions in scripts.
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:31:35AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
G
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 07:11:37PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 06:01:52PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > > Dear Russ, Joey, Debian Med team and evrybody,
>
> > > As proposed in 2010 (http://bugs.debian.org/190753#98), I would like to ask the
> > > Technical Comittee to reconsider our Policy, and restrict it to cases where the
> > > name of a program is an interface (http://bugs.debian.org/190753#128).
>
> > > I would like to know people's feeling about this.
>
> > Hello Charles,
>
> > The constitution does not grant the tech commitee the authority to
> > override the policy process.
>
> Er, it most certainly does.
>
> 6.1. Powers
>
> The Technical Committee may:
>
> 1. Decide on any matter of technical policy.
5. No detailed design work.
The Technical Committee does not engage in design of new proposals
and policies. Such design work should be carried out by individuals
privately or together and discussed in ordinary technical policy
and design forums.
The Technical Committee restricts itself to choosing from or
adopting compromises between solutions and decisions which have
been proposed and reasonably thoroughly discussed elsewhere.
Individual members of the technical committee may of course
participate on their own behalf in any aspect of design and policy
work.
Cheers,
--
Bill. <ballombe@debian.org>
Imagine a large red swirl here.
Reply to: