Re: [MoM]: r9659 - trunk/packages/fis-gtm/fis-gtm/trunk/debian
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 04:29:16PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> As a last resort for the *initial* packaging it might work out. Once we
> are doing the real packaging we should not try such dirty tricks.
Now that we can generate a mumps compiler by way of
compiling only C code I wonder whether there's still a need
to separate between "initial" and "real" packaging ? After
all, no "bootstrapping" is needed anymore ?
AFAIU we are currently creating a (standard) package for a
"programming-language-with-database-called-M" from its
FLOSS implementation "GT.M" by FiS ?
Having done that we would be creating a package to install
VistA as one (complex) application running in/on the
installed-by-package M environment (incidentally being
fis-gtm).
While, yes, one requires the other both are "proper" or
"real" packages ?
Am I on the wrong track ?
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
Reply to: