[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [MoM] Packaging fis-get





On 01/31/2012 04:16 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 01:40:22PM -0500, Bhaskar, K.S wrote:

[KSB3] <...snip...>
[KSB2] Yes, as human readable source code - even if generated by a
script from a text file - it should be DFSG free.  But the devil's
advocate argument is that even if it is human readable C code, since
it is generated from a text file, is is not source code.  But if
that works for getting GT.M into the package, lets do it.
Ftpmaster is not a devil so we will not be confronted with these
arguments.  So I'm in all favour of doing this.

[KSB3] I realize in hindsight that I should be careful when using English idioms on an international mailing list. By "devil's advocate argument" I did not mean to imply that anyone is a devil. It means "opposing argument" or "counter argument". So, I was just trying to list both view points. My apologies if I offended anyone and I will try to be more careful in the future.

Regards
-- Bhaskar


--
GT.M - Rock solid. Lightning fast. Secure. No compromises.

_____________
The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you.


Reply to: