Re: fixing rc-version-greater-than-expected-version
- To: debian-med@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: fixing rc-version-greater-than-expected-version
- From: Alex Mestiashvili <alex@biotec.tu-dresden.de>
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:47:25 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 502A109D.3020809@biotec.tu-dresden.de>
- In-reply-to: <20120731082156.GG26626@an3as.eu>
- References: <501682E0.5000507@gmail.com> <20120730141714.GD27820@an3as.eu> <20120730232457.GA10892@falafel.plessy.net> <20120731061437.GA26392@an3as.eu> <501790F1.2020607@gmail.com> <20120731082156.GG26626@an3as.eu>
On 07/31/2012 10:21 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:01:53AM +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
>
>> I would like to avoid adding the epoch in the middle of the minor
>> releases, i.e. -betaX.
>> Because the only reason is lintian's warning and not a significant
>> change in the software.
>>
>> And I also agree with Charles that it is better to wait until we really
>> need to add the epoch.
>> If we will need to do so at all.
>>
> Well, you are the person who is actively working on this package and if
> you have your way to make sure
>
> 1. you will notice new upstream releases
> 2. users will detect new package version
>
> this is fine for me whatever method you choose.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
>
Hi Andreas,
first of all sorry for the delay.
I'll go with overriding for 2.0.0-beta7 now and switch to epoch with the
next release -beta8.
Thank you and Charles for the useful discussion,
Alex
Reply to: