Re: Plans for ITK version 4
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 21:33 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 02:17:52PM -0400, Paul Novotny wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-06-03 at 00:11 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 06:38:16PM -0400, Paul Novotny wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2012-06-02 at 16:06 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > > > > First order of business is to go through the buildd logs and get a
> > > > > list of the issues. There is only one issue currently filed
> > > > > (#670609), a trivial missing "Conflicts".
> > > >
> > > > Can you push the latest changes to the build servers? I noticed that
> > > > they haven't been run in some time, and don't include the big endian fix
> > > > I submitted a while back. That way, we can have the more up to date
> > > > status of how things stand.
> > >
> > > Well, as things stand now, ITK 4 no longer builds on
> > > AMD64, either, so I was unable to upload.
> >
> > well, at least things are consistent now. :-)
>
> So I just noticed that my nightly build of ITK 4 has been
> failing ever since Debian switched to gcc 4.7 [1]. The
> previous night was successful [2]. Might be worth switching
> to gcc-4.6 for the build.
Tried some things out yesterday, all the tests pass when compiling with
DEBUG. Compiling with RELWITHDEBINFO gets rid of all the segfaults from
the tests, but the failures persist. So there's something, makes
debugging interesting. I'll give gcc-4.6 a try.
-Paul
Reply to: