Re: Non-copyrightable work with non-free license.
- To: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: Non-copyrightable work with non-free license.
- From: Charles Plessy <email@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 12:53:46 +0900
- Message-id: <20120509035346.GA313@falafel.plessy.net>
- In-reply-to: <20120405011115.GD30878@falafel.plessy.net>
- References: <20120303110454.GB20446@falafel.plessy.net> <20120314235218.GA14855@falafel.plessy.net> <20120315073051.GL19366@an3as.eu> <20120402140011.GB10280@falafel.plessy.net> <20120402165432.GA20330@roeckx.be> <20120404141303.GX22869@onerussian.com> <20120404172638.GA30224@virgil.dodds.net> <20120404224725.GO13570@rzlab.ucr.edu> <20120405011115.GD30878@falafel.plessy.net>
Le Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 10:11:15AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> I will wait a bit for other comments, and then re-contact UniProt as Ian
I re-contacted UniProt, and they proposed to add a clarification on their
license page, in line with what I proposed, that a couple of records taken
isolatedly for being used in test suites do not infringe their license on
the database as a whole.
I asked them if I can quote the details in public, and got no answer yet, so I
will instead send a copy on debian-private, plus one to the FTP team for
triplechecking that their are fine with this.
Then, if nobody objects, I will considered the problem solved and update the
Have a nice day,
Debian Med packaging team,
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan