Format specification of debian/upstream files (Was: Status bibref gatherer)
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 05:11:00PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> If we can ensure this on the basis of a format following the current
> practical usage (including hashes and arrays) I personally see no need
> to change what I would call as standard adopted by debian/upstream
> writers. Please put some light for us in some other problems from your
> more knowledged point of view in case I might have overseen something.
I hope that my Git push now hit the repository. I'll meet some DDs at
the weekend at Chemnitzer LinuxTage. Charles, it would help if you
could enlighten me about the potential problems the current usage of
hashes and arrays might cause. There is some chance for face to face
discussion here and I would love if we could settle with some agreement
in a not so long time frame to finally get rid of the longish tasks
files by moving the references to debian/upstream.