Hi Charles! On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 15:46:54 +0200, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 01:49:04PM +0200, Luca Capello a écrit : >> While looking if it would be possible to backport mafft to squeeze I >> discovered that mafft FTBFS on ia64 [1] and I could reproduce it on >> merulo.d.o [2], from where the output and attached file come. Given >> that is seems to be a bug in gcc, reporting to this latter package (with >> the version available on the sid dchroot on merulo.d.o) and adding the >> Affects: to the former (and cc:ing its maintainer). > > Thanks a lot Luca for doing the Right Thing. You are welcome, but you missed a ™ ;-) > Actually, my motivation when following tightly recent upstream releases of > MAFFT (we often skip some as they are quite frequent) was to see if the ia64 > build failure was reproducible. Unfortunately it is. I remember I checked version 6.859-1 and it was already FTBFS on ia64, but I did not have time to report it. Today I was during a computer-only working day, so I reported it. I like to test stuff, I simply do not have time to maintain packages ;-) Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca
Attachment:
pgpJVGo9pMQfL.pgp
Description: PGP signature