Most of the packages done in the sprint and as a indirect consequence of the sprint are in
Hi,
I'm quite proud to say that we now managed to get most of those packages
we started working in the Debian Med sprint in Travemünde have now hit
unstable or experimental. That's really cool! Thanks to all who had
spend their time (specifically Steffen for organising the sprint).
One point I do not feel really good about is the creation of two new
tasks. I discussed[1] this in the beginning but the discussion faded
out with no result. Before I start building new Debian Med packages now
I would like to push a bit the decision process. The rationale is that
I have th egut feeling that the additional tasks (which are actually
subtasks of bio) are not properly maintained. The reason is that we
would need to create duplicate entries for some packages in bio and
bio-ngs / bio-phylogeny. I admit I'm more or less focussing on bio and
not on those subtasks. The reason for this is to 75% that I personally
do not feel qualified enough to decide about the content of a program
whether it fits in and 25% is simply lazyness: "Do it in bio now you
can always maintain those subtasks later (=never)."
BTW, the reasoning above is to some extend also true for the cloud task
- as far as I know not all non-GUI packages which are now in unstable
are mentioned in this task.
To reflect this problem I used the option which was previousely
introduced in the Blends framework which prevents building a metapackage
from a task file. It will only be displayed in the web sentinel. So
I tagged bio-bgs and bio-phylogeny
Metapackage: false
If you do not agree with this decision please do the following:
1. Double check whether both tasks are really containing all
packages which should be in.
2. Drop the "Metapackage: false" statement.
I would like to create new metapackages in about ten days.
Kind regards
Andreas.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2011/01/msg00084.html
----- Forwarded message from tille@users.alioth.debian.org -----
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 07:28:22 -0000
To: blends-commit@lists.alioth.debian.org
From: tille@users.alioth.debian.org
Subject: r2758 - in /projects/med/trunk/debian-med/tasks:
bio-ngs bio-phylogeny
Author: tille
Date: Wed Apr 20 07:28:10 2011
New Revision: 2758
URL: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/blends/?sc=1&rev=2758
Log:
Prevent building metapackages for the moment
Modified:
projects/med/trunk/debian-med/tasks/bio-ngs
projects/med/trunk/debian-med/tasks/bio-phylogeny
Modified: projects/med/trunk/debian-med/tasks/bio-ngs
URL: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/blends/projects/med/trunk/debian-med/tasks/bio-ngs?rev=2758&op=diff
==============================================================================
--- projects/med/trunk/debian-med/tasks/bio-ngs (original)
+++ projects/med/trunk/debian-med/tasks/bio-ngs Wed Apr 20 07:28:10 2011
@@ -1,7 +1,10 @@
Task: Next Generation Sequencing
Description: Debian Med bioinformatics applications usable in Next Generation Sequencing
- It aims at gettting packages which specializes in alignment of sequences produced by next generation sequencing.
-
+ It aims at gettting packages which specializes in alignment of
+ sequences produced by next generation sequencing.
+Metapackage: false
+Comment: Do not build a metapackage because it is not clear in how far this set of
+ packages is complete regarding NGS.
Depends:
bwa,
Modified: projects/med/trunk/debian-med/tasks/bio-phylogeny
URL: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/blends/projects/med/trunk/debian-med/tasks/bio-phylogeny?rev=2758&op=diff
==============================================================================
--- projects/med/trunk/debian-med/tasks/bio-phylogeny (original)
+++ projects/med/trunk/debian-med/tasks/bio-phylogeny Wed Apr 20 07:28:10 2011
@@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
Task: Phylogeny
Description: Debian Med phylogeny packages
- This metapackage will install Debian packages related to phylogeny for
- use in life sciences.
+ This lists Debian packages related to phylogeny for use in life sciences.
+Metapackage: false
+Comment: Do not build a metapackage because it is not clear in how far this set of
+ packages is complete regarding phylogeny.
X-Begin-Category: Phylogenetic analysis
----- End forwarded message -----
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: