On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 10:33:06AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > I understand your decision for clustalx. I think that there would still be a > benefit to have clustalw in main for Squeeze, in particular for the generation > of entirely Free Squeeze derivatives for science. While we offer a large number > of alternatives, Clustal W is the reference in its field. Would it make sense to "just" offer a backport of the current version through backports.d.o instead? Kind regards Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature