[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Dotter versus acedb-other-dotter



Hi,

when updating the Homepage field in our tasks file I stumbled upon a
question:  We have acedb-other-dotter (src-package acedb) which
Provides: dotter.  What actually is the relation between dotter and
acedb-other-dotter and is the entry for dotter possibly redundant and
should be deleted because we will never package this duplicated
functionality (or is it even the same code?)

Kind regards

        Andreas.

----- Forwarded message from tille@users.alioth.debian.org -----

Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:36:12 -0000
To: blends-commit@lists.alioth.debian.org
From: tille@users.alioth.debian.org
X-Spam_score: -4.0
Subject: r2856 - /projects/med/trunk/debian-med/tasks/bio

Author: tille
Date: Mon Jun 27 11:36:11 2011
New Revision: 2856

URL: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/blends/?sc=1&rev=2856
Log:
Fixed Homepage of dotter - please clarify whether this is something else than acedb-other-dotter

Modified:
    projects/med/trunk/debian-med/tasks/bio

Modified: projects/med/trunk/debian-med/tasks/bio
URL: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/blends/projects/med/trunk/debian-med/tasks/bio?rev=2856&op=diff
==============================================================================
--- projects/med/trunk/debian-med/tasks/bio (original)
+++ projects/med/trunk/debian-med/tasks/bio Mon Jun 27 11:36:11 2011
@@ -2161,7 +2161,7 @@
  "free as in beer" binary download - so this is not for us ...
 
 Depends: dotter
-Homepage: http://www.cgb.ki.se/cgb/groups/sonnhammer/Dotter.html
+Homepage: http://sonnhammer.sbc.su.se/Dotter.html
 License: to be clarified
 Responsible: BioLinux - Stewart Houten <shou@ceh.ac.uk>
 Pkg-URL: http://nebc.nox.ac.uk/bio-linux/dists/unstable/bio-linux/binary-i386/


_______________________________________________
Blends-commit mailing list
Blends-commit@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/blends-commit


----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


Reply to: