Re: blast+ packaging
Hi,
please feel free to commit in my dir. It will indeed be easier than merging.
Your deep knowledge of compilation stuff of blast is one of the reason I asked you to review the package.
I am sure that your updates will be perfect.
For dir updates, be it ncbi-blast+ or ncbi-blast-plus, I would rather like you update directly in my branch. We can, after that, "mv" the svn dir to ncbi-blast+ once everything is ok from packaging point of view.
Please tell me once you have included your updates so that I recheck the package on my side.
Regarding legacy, I prefered keeping it as separate package to avoid some confusion and get it only if required on backward compatibility. Though, if you think we should keep it in the same package, it is ok for me.
Thanks for your help
Olivier
----- Mail original -----
> De: "Aaron M. Ucko" <ucko@debian.org>
> À: "Andreas Tille" <tille@debian.org>
> Cc: "Aaron M. Ucko" <ucko@debian.org>, "Olivier Sallou" <olivier.sallou@irisa.fr>
> Envoyé: Samedi 28 Mai 2011 18:06:35
> Objet: Re: blast+ packaging
> Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> writes:
>
> > [Olivier in CC]
>
> Thanks; I had considered that myself.
>
> > If you ask me this is no question of politeness. I personally would
> > prefer if somebody would commit straight to the place where I was
> > working and I would not need to do any fiddling around with SVN to
> > merge both. I'm just mentioning this - feel free to find a common
> > agreement with Olivier.
>
> Once the changes are in the repository, anyone can readily merge them
> into .../ncbi-blast-plus if Olivier wants to keep that path. OTOH, if
> he's open to the path change, this is as good a way as any to
> establish it.
>
> --
> Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
> http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ |
> http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?amu@monk.mit.edu
Reply to: