Re: Maq replaced by Bwa?
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 11:12:48AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> This said, perhaps we can upload the package with the updated description, to
> make it clear that maq is not so important in case it suddenly needs some QA
> that our team can not do in time.
I would like to see this info in long description as well (perhaps in
more detail in README.Debian). I also wonder if it makes sense to
add a
Recommends: bwa
or even
Depends: bwa
to reflect the issue on a technical basis.
I'll leave these ideas to you experts in this field.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: