Re: [Debian-med-packaging] dicomscope_3.6.0-1_i386.changes REJECTED
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Barry deFreese <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Ah, if the pdfs were generated from the source then that is OK and is my
> mistake. The lut files sound OK too. If those were the only two binary file
> types, we should be OK, just re-upload and I will fast-track it.
Just a suggestion, as this is the second or third time that I see this
happening: can't we get questions first and, if necessary, a reject
Now it seems that it happens like this: reject the package and then
ask about it (and ask to reupload it when the doubts are answered).
It would save some time from the maintainers and also some bandwidth.