Re: [med-svn] r4096 - trunk/packages/vxl/trunk/debian

[Daniel Leidert <daniel.leidert.spam@gmx.net>]

Am Samstag, den 03.10.2009, 13:33 +0200 schrieb Daniel Leidert:
> Am Samstag, den 03.10.2009, 12:18 +0200 schrieb Mathieu Malaterre:
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 02:55:04PM +0000, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > >> +common-build-arch::
> > >> +     echo "$(pkg_lib): package-name-doesnt-match-sonames" > debian/$(pkg_lib).lintian-overrides
> > >> +     dh_lintian
> > >
> > > I don't think that ftpmaster will really like this.  Why not just
> > > adapting the package name?  If there are real reasons to do so please
> > > also add a comment about the reasons to the override.
> > 
> > This is just a lintian style issue. This is how -AFAIK- you can
> > provide a libvxl package which provides a libvnl.so /
> > libvnl_testing.so... I have been using it in GDCM, I saw that in other
> > packages too.
> 
> JFTR: A lintian override for a package shipping several libraries is
> IMHO fully correct. There is no policy to split the library package into
> several packages with one package per library. At least I don't know
> one.
> 
> The package name is IMO still wrong. It should be libvxl1 and not
> libvxl1.13 according to the library packaging guide and a simple
[snip]

Ah sorry. Missed the

lib*.so._1.13_ -> lib*.so.1.13.0

Should be correct then.

Regards, Daniel