Re: libqsearch under Debian Med group maintenance? (corrected)
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 08:40:17AM -0700, Rudi Cilibrasi wrote:
> I will try to upload a fix for the bug and try to transfer to
> debian-med team maintenance. I have a newborn son (2 weeks old)
Ahh - congratulations! ;-)
> and a
> computer crash (also 2 weeks old) for which I am expecting to receive
> replacement parts by mail tonight. I expect to repair / replace the
> broken system in the next few days and then on the weekend I will try
> to do these two things.
Make sure that your "real" baby has always higher priority than Debian.
;-)
> I must admit that although I have frequently
> cooperated with many Debian team members on specific bugs / patches /
> questions in my packaging, I have never yet formally transferred any
> of my packages to team maintainence. I am looking forward to figuring
> out this process better in October with libqsearch and other packages.
> Any more info you might provide in this regard would be useful to me.
>
> Thanks for the kind information already sent; it is much appreciated.
Well, I have some experience which fields have to be set and how to
check in policy compliant with *SVN*. So if you are fine with SVN I'd
volunteer to do the work for you. You should just decide whether you
prefer to maintain it in the Debian Science or Debian Med scope. IMHO
both is fine in principle, bt I would tend to put it into science
because it is a more general library (if I'm not missleaded).
Considering that it is usefull in biology as well as in other sciences
it fits better in Debian Science (but you might correct me if I'm
wrong).
So my offer is the following: Put the package into Debian Science SVN
use Debien Science Team as Maintainer and add you (and me in case I'll
do the first upload as Uploaders). Just tell me if this is fine for
you.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: