[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: pvrg sponsoring



On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Nelson A. de Oliveira<naoliv@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Mathieu
> Malaterre<mathieu.malaterre@gmail.com> wrote:
>>  Could someone please sponsor the pvrg package, I have cleanup the
>> remaining lintian issues.
>
> Not fully clean :-)
> See the attached lintian output.
>
> Wouldn't it be better to have the source package and the binary
> package as "pvrg-jpeg" instead "pvrg" only, since pvrg is "Portable
> Video Research Group" and you aren't packaging a "group", right? :-)
>
> (The program could also be installed as "pvrg-jpeg" too)
>
> Also, patch the manpage.
> Since you are renaming the program to pvrgjpeg, it would be good to
> have its manpage also updated (replace jpeg -> pvrgjpeg; for example,
> manpage says to type "jpeg -d -s image.jpg", while it should be
> patched to "pvrgjpeg -d -s image.jpg")
>
> And while building it, there are a lot of warnings about "implicit
> declaration of function".
> I didn't verify, but maybe it could fails to build with gcc 4.4
> If yes, then you will need to patch the sources to include the needed headers.

Should be all done. I tried compiling with gcc-snapshot and it
compiled ok (tons of warnings though).


Thanks,
-- 
Mathieu


Reply to: