In <20090728163525.GC31612@an3as.eu>, Andreas Tille wrote: >On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:50:10PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: >> > This patch is a good idea -- fixed length buffers are rarely >> > considered user-friendly. However, it is executed poorly; it's not >> > ready for upstream in its current state. >> >> Hi, thank you for the comment. >> I will stop to apply this patch until a better solution is found. > >Quite late comment after working down my batch of unread mail: >The patch was *not* *only* to avoid fixed length buffers - it was >invented to stop mummer from *crashing*. In that case I recommend leaving the patch applied, opening a bug, and assigning it to me. I can re-write the patch to avoid having statements with side-effects inside assert() calls. I may be able to reply with a corrected patch later today. P.S. Please CC me if you drop debian-mentors, I am not subscribed to debian-med. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. firstname.lastname@example.org ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.