Re: dicomscope documentation

[Mathieu Malaterre <mathieu.malaterre@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org> wrote:
>> Le Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:47:42PM +0100, Michael Hanke a écrit :
>> >
>> > Please pardon my ignorance, but is a PDF itself not considered
>> > problematic since it is most likely not the 'source'?
>
>> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 08:10:25PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> Instead of repacking a corrected tarball for Debian, I recommend to suggest
>> Upstream to publish a tarball version 3.6.0.1 (or whichever), with the updated
>> documentation.
>
> Sorry, I completely misunderstood the original question.
>
> We have to ask Upstream to upload with the PDF source of course :)

OFFIS DICOM team did fixed the upstream zip file.

WARNING: my get-orig-source is not capable of detecting that. You'll
need to manually delete any previous src tarball.

Thanks
-- 
Mathieu