Il giorno Mon, 1 Oct 2007 09:32:13 +0200 (CEST) Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de> ha scritto: > On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, David Paleino wrote: > > > To work with the Debian BTS, we could use its SOAP interface [1], that > > shouldn't be too much difficult. > > Any work on this is greatly apreciated. I'll work on that ASAP :) > The only thing that is written down for the moment is > > http://people.debian.org/~tille/cdd/ch-todo.en.html#s-visibility I'll read it as soon as I have some time :) > and here the pargraph 8.2.1 and 8.2.2. In addition to this I'm currently > thinking about how to reasonable generalise the interesting page at > > http://pkg-grass.alioth.debian.org/debiangis-status.html In pkg-perl we have kinda the same thing: http://pkg-perl.alioth.debian.org/qa/versions.html > A parapgraph 8.2.3 about this will be written soon. > > > (once I made a simple PHP script which parsed a .diff file (*.diff.gz > > gunzipped) and output various info -- I'm uploading it to [2] -- the diff > > file is a sample diff from one of my packages). We can use this script to > > take information about our packages ;) > > Well, parsing the diff.gz is one thing but I think we better relay on > the dpkg / apt-get information that is provided via a common interface. > The approach to parse the diff files sounds kind of hackish. Well, consider that the original thing was created to be run from PHP-CLI. I've just adapted it to web (file uploads - <br />'s instead of \n's...) > Regarding to a general roadmap I have the following items on my notepad: > > 1. Pseude tasks-Files for not yet included software to enable inclusion > on the web page in the same manner as official packages Agreed. > assigning a software name with > > - Field (done by listing it in the according task file) > - URL Parsable in debian/control (we now have Homepage: field - as discussed on debian-devel) > - WNPP bug number > - watch file Both parsable from the debian/ directory. (I've written a bit of perl script which retrieves the WNPP bug number from http://bugs.debian.org/wnpp -- not from debian/. We can use it) > 2. http://qa.debian.org/developer.php - like page > > obtain everything the packages overview is listing plus > > - ... Agreed, but most things already are on the QA page (see backports, wnpp, popcon) > 3. Quality numbers: > - ... > - Number of Mailinglists and frequency of postings on these lists What do you mean here? > - size of source archive and number of lines of code We could even make a graph of the packages basing on lines of code :) (/me really likes the idea) > 4. Technical description: > - Programming language > - Used database Fully agreed. > These are information about included and not yet included pieces of software > that would be interesting to evaluate the quality of the software. All this > stuff is not really Debian-Med specific but should concern other CDDs like > Debian-Edu, Debian-Jr, Debian-GIS etc. Sure, why not? :) > > I got a [RKI-Spam-Verdacht] tag on the reply I received. Not on this, > > though. > > Which means RKI = my institute; Spam = Spam :); Verdacht = suspicion. > I think you should ignore this - no idea why this genearl filter catched > it - my own fine grained one did not. Don't worry :) > Kind regards > Andreas. Have a nice day, David P.S.: /me goes to study -- Laboratory Diagnostics exams on Oct, 9th. :( -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://snipurl.com/qa_page/ : :' : Linuxer #334216 | http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://www.debianizzati.org/ `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature