Bug#130637: Package tea exist in Debian now (fwd)
Hello,
from the low bug number I guess this is a quite old WNPP from the early
days of Debian-Med but if I'm not completely wrong the inclusion of tea
was requested here. The question is: How should we handle packages which
do not directly fall in the field of medical software but to a general
infra-structure which is usefull aslo in the field of medicine?
Kind regards
Andreas.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 05:18:07 -0700
From: Debian Bug Tracking System <owner@bugs.debian.org>
Reply-To: 130637@bugs.debian.org
To: Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>
Subject: Bug#130637 acknowledged by developer (Package exist in Debian
now)
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#130637: RFP: tea -- mail encryption on the mailserver,
which was filed against the wnpp package.
It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>.
Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is
unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate
message then please contact the developer, by replying to this email.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Received: (at 130637-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Apr 2005 12:04:52 +0000
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 06:04:48 -0600
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
To: 130637-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Package exist in Debian now
It seems that the package you have requested now exists in the
Debian archive.
Information about the package:
Package: tea
Binary: tea
Version: 7.0-1
Priority: optional
Section: editors
Maintainer: Lior Kaplan <webmaster@guides.co.il>
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), libaspell-dev, libgtk2.0-dev
Architecture: any
Standards-Version: 3.6.1
Format: 1.0
Directory: pool/main/t/tea
Files: ebf748c4a7e46a47e59195ef7594fc85 573 tea_7.0-1.dsc
9c659f2a4caae3b969304bae6f643b78 396692 tea_7.0.orig.tar.gz
975752ed658417eb9ab45a1edefcf814 10426 tea_7.0-1.diff.gz
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
Reply to: